SECTION 2.20
AFFIRMATIVE ACTION PROGRAM PROCEDURES
Last
Update: 9/05
The State’s Affirmative Action
Program is a temporary measure adopted by the State until such time as its
workforce matches or surpasses the relevant labor force as defined by the most
recent U.S. Census and undoes the results of past practice. As part of this
commitment, executive branch departments are required to submit an annual
report of their affirmative action progress to the Iowa Department of
Administrative Services – Human Resources Enterprise (DAS-HRE). This report, as
required by Code chapter 19B, must comply with specific standards applicable to
each state agency based on the relevant labor pool from which the agency draws
or the persons that can be reasonably recruited. Some departments, because of
their size, may not be required to set remedial goals; however, all
departments are required to adopt the State of Iowa Equal Opportunity,
Affirmative Action and Anti-Discrimination Policy contained in Section 2.40 of
this chapter.
There are three components to the
State’s effort to develop an effective affirmative action program:
·
DAS-HRE provides each department with affirmative
action planning materials.
·
Departments work with DAS-HRE to develop both a
Quantitative Analysis Report and a Qualitative Analysis Plan for the fiscal
year. DAS-HRE folds these plans into an
enterprise affirmative action report/plan.
·
DAS-HRE assists departments in recruiting protected
class applicants and developing effective selection plans to meet their hiring
goals. DAS-HRE also provides assistance and guidance to departments as they
carry out the action plans that comprise their qualitative analysis plans. Departments cooperate with DAS-HRE on
affirmative action and equal opportunity monitoring and quarterly reporting.
A.
Affirmative Action Plan Preparation:
1.
This process mirrors the State’s fiscal year.
Workforce data is based on the last pay period of the current fiscal year and
the first pay period of the next.
Departments have approximately a month from the time they receive this
data from DAS-HRE in which to complete their report/plan and submit it to
DAS-HRE. DAS-HRE has until September 30
to compile an enterprise report/plan and submit it to the Governor.
2.
DAS-HRE notifies departments of the annual reporting
period due dates and provides the reporting materials. This may occur during an
annual update meeting with affirmative action contacts, depending upon the
need.
3.
DAS-HRE calculates departments’ workforce utilization
rates. This automated process provides
the data that departments need to focus their affirmative action efforts on
developing methods to remedy any identified underutilization of protected
groups. This data is sent to departments
following the conclusion of the last pay period in the current fiscal year and
after the first pay period of the new fiscal year.
4.
This is both a report and plan. Departments report their actions and
successes in the current planning year and detail how they plan to address
their underutilization in the next planning year.
5.
Planning materials consist of the following sections:
a.
Cover Page: This form specifies the period
covered by the Affirmative Action Plan, the affirmative action reporting
unit(s) included in the Plan, the person(s) responsible for preparing the
report, the department director’s signature (approval), and the signatures for
DAS-HRE acknowledgement.
b.
Goals and Timetables: This computer-generated form (AA Form D)
includes the amount of underutilization for females and minorities for each EEO-4
Category used by the department and the departmentwide underutilization for
persons with disabilities. It also includes hiring goals for the upcoming year
and the year in which the workforce should balance.
Typically, the hiring goals are
calculated by DAS-HRE for the department’s review. The hiring goals are based on the
department’s hiring trends in that particular EEO-4 Category over the last
two-three years. Timetables are also
predetermined by calculating the number of years needed to eliminate the
underutilization, based on the current goal.
After receiving the Goals and
Timetables, the person preparing the Affirmative Action Plan should review
these with department management.
Departments should review the projected hires used to calculate the goals
and timetables.
If in agreement with the
predetermined goals and timetables, the AA contact signs the “Department
Approval” line on the report.
If not in agreement with the
predetermined goals and timetables, the AA Contact should discuss the proposed
revisions with DAS-HRE. Once agreement
has been reached with DAS-HRE, the AA Contact then signs the form, followed by
DAS-HRE sign-off.
Under
atypical circumstances, DAS-HRE may delegate goal-setting directly to the
department, to be followed by DAS-HRE review.
An example of such a situation would be when projected hiring is
anticipated to decrease from past practice due to hiring freezes or budget
constraints. In such case, the
department has the better perspective on the type of hiring it may be doing. Such hiring may vary considerably from past
practice.
c.
Qualitative Plan Results for Current FY (AA Form A): This is an assessment, by EEO-4 Category for
females and minorities and departmentwide for persons with disabilities, of how
well the department met the objectives of non-remedial goals set for the
current (closing) planning year. Reasons
for not meeting the objectives may feed into the section on “Factors
Contributing to Underutilization” as well as serve as the basis for setting
reasonable, practical and workable non-remedial goals set for the upcoming
planning year.
d.
Qualitative Utilization Analysis for Current FY (AA
Form B): This
computer-generated form (also available online) comes with the underutilization
data filled in by EEO-Category for females and minorities and by department for
persons with disabilities. Based on
their firsthand knowledge of their operations, departments are asked to list
the reasons why they believe they are underutilized. This is not to be in the form of a justification,
e.g., “The budget prevented us from making protected group hires.” Rather,
factors must be presented in a manner in which possible methods for developing
remedial action plans can be explored.
Examples of some factors include the following:
(1)
Limited number of protected group applicants.
(2)
Protected group applicants do not meet the
qualifications.
(3)
Excessive turnover of protected group employees.
(4)
Protected group employees were not available for
promotions.
(5)
Protected group applicants or employees were unwilling
or unable to work during the hours, at the work sites, or under the conditions
of employment required for the available position.
e.
Qualitative Utilization Analysis Plan for Next FY (AA
Form C): This is a
computer-generated form (also available online), again formatted by EEO-4
Category. The plan preparer uses the results of the previous year’s plan and
the “Qualitative Utilization Analysis” described in d. above as the basis for
developing plans to address current underutilization. An action plan is completed for each area of
underutilization. These are not
rationales; these are definitive action steps for addressing the specific
causes of the underutilization. See “Strategies
for Addressing Factors Contributing to Underutilization” and “Low-Cost
Recruitment Strategies” in Section 2.50 of this chapter.
Agencies
should begin working on these plans before the current fiscal year ends or as
close as possible to the start of the new fiscal year so they can be taken into
account when developing the department’s overall budget and work plans for the
year.
B.
Affirmative Action Plan Review:
1.
Departments must submit their Affirmative Action
Plans for review by the due date set by DAS-HRE. This is to ensure that DAS-HRE is able to
finish the annual Affirmative Action Report and Plan required by law by
September 30.
2.
Using the Affirmative Action Plan Review Criteria and
Review Form, DAS-HRE staff review whether each section of the Report/Plan has
been completed appropriately and incorporate this information into the
Enterprise Report/Plan. If questions
arise, they will contact the plan preparer and/or management liaison for that
department to resolve them prior to conclusion of the Report/Plan.
C.
Monitoring and Reporting:
1.
Monitoring of ongoing efforts to fulfill the goals
established in the affirmative action plans takes place in the following
manner:
a.
Quarterly Affirmative Action Reports: Each quarter, DAS-HRE prepares a progress
report identifying changes in the underutilized workforce and the corresponding
effect of these changes on affirmative action hiring goal achievement and
progress towards a balanced workforce. A summary of this information is sent to
each department.
b.
Hiring Decision Recordkeeping: When departments have an opportunity to fill
vacancies, they are notified whether the position being filled is an
underutilized job class. The fact that a
remedial hiring goal may exist does not replace the requirement for equal
employment opportunity or the need to hire the best qualified applicants. Applicants must never be interviewed or hired
solely based on their characteristics related to a hiring goal. If affirmative action is to operate
correctly, however, applicant characteristics may be considered as additional
factors where applicants’ qualifications are relatively equal.
Departments
will document the hiring process followed and the reasons for the hiring
decisions made. These documents shall be
kept by the department for three years and may be requested by DAS-HRE.